Back to Sport

The Rangers’ health review needs decisions someone owns

Chris Young’s plan to examine individual offseason routines is reasonable. For the Rangers, accountability will depend on separating preventable problems from bad luck and judging the work by more than spring availability.

Quincy Nash

September 29, 20263 min read

Chris Young’s Monday announcement gave the Rangers a sensible offseason priority and an uncomfortable assignment. The organization will examine individual offseason programs, monitor them where it can and make adjustments when necessary as it pursues greater health and dependability.

The season included 34 injured-list stints. Young declined to blame the training staff and pointed to its work keeping Jacob deGrom available. That is a fair distinction, but it leaves an organizational task: establish what was known, what was recommended and who was responsible for the next decision. A review becomes useful when it changes how a club acts.

The first requirement is classification. A review that treats every injury as proof of a defective offseason routine will be dressed-up hindsight. A review that treats every setback as unavoidable will be an expensive exercise in shrugging.

Corey Seager offers the clearest test of that distinction. Young disclosed that Seager has been dealing with an elbow bone spur for roughly two months. Surgery is possible, but no treatment decision has been made, and Young characterized the potential procedure as minor with a full recovery expected.

Those are important developments for the Rangers’ winter planning. They do not establish that the issue caused Seager’s entire season, or explain every poor stretch.

Seager hit .227 with a .736 OPS in 102 games, numbers that invite scrutiny but do not supply a diagnosis. His finish complicates any easy explanation: after his final injured-list return, he appeared in 51 of the Rangers’ last 53 games and hit .269, .332 and .472 in the corresponding batting-average, on-base and slugging categories, with 10 home runs.

That late production should prompt the club to examine symptom progression, rest, workload and return-to-play judgments. It should not encourage anyone to redraw the whole season around a medical disclosure made in September.

Josh Jung requires a different kind of review. He fractured his right hand when a Joe Ryan pitch hit him Friday, and Young said Monday that surgical and nonsurgical options were still being considered. A pitch fracture is an acute event, not a ready-made indictment of an offseason conditioning plan.

The Rangers should still inspect how Jung’s earlier physical issues were managed, how his workload was built and whether the return process was appropriately cautious. But those questions must remain separate from the unsupported claim that his offseason routine created this injury.

That separation is the difference between accountability and accusation. Individual programs are supposed to reflect individual needs. If the club cannot distinguish traumatic injury, recurrence, workload management and medical uncertainty, it will produce a thick report that teaches nobody much.

DeGrom supplies a useful counterweight to the impulse to measure success only by games missed. The 38-year-old made 31 starts, threw 162.2 innings and struck out 201. He also finished with a 4.20 ERA.

Young said deGrom needs rest and recovery, and the pitcher’s season shows why dependability has two dimensions: reaching the mound and performing like the pitcher the roster was built around. One does not automatically guarantee the other.

The Rangers’ review should therefore have named outputs, even if Monday’s announcement did not. Each player’s plan needs a clear owner across baseball operations, medical staff, performance personnel and the player. Checkpoints should be documented. Adjustments should be tied to symptoms, workload and observed performance rather than vague promises. Outside doctors and therapists can add perspective, but they cannot replace internal judgment or responsibility.

Next spring can show how participation and workloads develop. It cannot demonstrate that a program has prevented an injury that never occurs, nor can an uneventful camp guarantee an uneventful summer. The clearer test is whether Texas can explain how a concern moves from observation to a decision and who is responsible for acting.

That would give Young’s review a practical consequence when the next setback arrives.

Sources

Dallas Morning News: offseason review

Dallas Morning News: medical updates

MLB: Rangers press conference

MLB: 2026 player statistics

MLB: 2026 player statistics

Share

Quincy Nash

Quincy Nash covers Prosper high school and area college sports.

Related Stories

More in Weather